One of the questions I am constantly wondering is “why are so many of the technology writers against Microsoft”. Seriously, this is actually one of those things I wonder all the time. They are not supposed to be “Joe Shmoe” that only knows that Microsoft was sued for being a monopoly (10 years ago) or some old perception. They are supposed to be “in the know”, “in the loop”, have a deep knowledge of the industry and let’s not forget journalists. Instead it is non-stop “bash Microsoft”. Sure Microsoft deserves their fair share of criticism. Microsoft has made sub par products or not kept up with the market, but who hasn’t made mistakes? But the technology writers root for Microsoft to fail and it doesn’t take reading between the lines to notice it.
Categories: Thought Tags: Apple, Bill Gates, CNET, Google, Java, Journalism, Microsoft, MySQL, Sun, TechCrunch, Yellow
Let me get this out first… The iPhone is a really cool phone. I don’t want one and I am happy with my Windows Mobile phone. I do really miss the crackberry, but the company won’t pay for it anymore….
So with that discloser out there, I have to say the whining about the iPhone is ridiculous… Michael Arington of TechCrunch “officially quit the iPhone”… Why? Because he can’t use a competitive service with an ATT phone.
According to TechCrunch a hacker gained access to Twitter’s secret documents. Then the hacker gave the documents to TechCrunch… I am assuming there was a “financial transaction” to break the story and so that TechCrunch could “Lay bare Twitters Strategy to be the pulse of the world”. Which is not exactly ground breaking news and is pretty obvious from how they have positioned themselves through marketing and expansion. I have just a couple issue with this “news story”.
- Ethics – It is not investigative journalism, but theft.They literally have peoples pay, SSN numbers, and employment records outside of the business decision of the company. TechCrunch did nothing but pay for (assumption) or be the favorite tech blog for a hacker. I am assuming TechCrunch is not handing over the information of the hacker due to “confidentiality” and “journalistic ethics”. I doubt TechCrunch would be thrilled or happy if a hacker broke into their system and then a competitive blog “laid their strategy to bare”.
- The Obvious – I read through the article and I didn’t find anything really new. Gee, Twitter wants to rival Google… Ok, so does everybody. Twitter had discussions with Microsoft, Google and Facebook…. So this is shocking? Twitter is worried about Google killing them… Why would the be afraid of the “we’re not evil” company? Oh, because they crush their competition just like Microsoft did….. Twitter worries about growth… Yeah, can kind of understand that…
- Support – TechCrunch has been very “up” on Twitter and their service. I have read many glowing post on Twitter and how great of a service it is.. So why would you intentionally damage your relationship with Twitter? Beyond that why would you intentionally damage a company that you support? Twitter will be even more guarded on communications, the companies it is/was talking to will be more hesitant to work with Twitter…
I just think this is another example of the ends justify the means. The information was gained illegally. It wasn’t a plot to kill some one or some illegal scheme, just internal documents from a company that is the “flavor of the day”. I find it sad that TechCrunch decided to publish the information, I find it sad that TechCrunch is enjoying this and I find it sad that they are protecting a criminal who also has this information. That person could have also sold the information with the employees SSN and other personal information to others.
Permanent link to this post (410 words, 1 image, estimated 1:38 mins reading time)
I was reading TechCrunch this morning and was surprised to see the review for Microsoft’s new search engine Bing. Bing is the replacement for Live Search. I haven’t had a chance to try it out much, but so far it is much needed improvement over Live search. Not sure if it has hit the Google level yet, but I’ll use Bing for my main search engine just like I used Live.
Well give Bing a try and see what you think. I’ll make my assessment after a few days of use.
Permanent link to this post (92 words, estimated 22 secs reading time)
One of the questions I am constantly wondering is “why are so many of the technology writers against Microsoft”. Seriously, this is actually one of those things I wonder all the time. They are not supposed to be “Joe Shmoe” that only knows that Microsoft was sued for being a monopoly (10 years ago) or some old perception. They are supposed to be “in the know”, “in the loop”, have a deep knowledge of the industry and let’s not forget journalists. Instead it is non-stop “bash Microsoft”. Sure Microsoft deserves their fair share of criticism. Microsoft has made sub par products or not kept up with the market, but who hasn’t made mistakes? But the technology writers root for Microsoft to fail and it doesn’t take reading between the lines to notice it.
